#6 Feminism: Ten Reasons Why Voting Democrat is a Sin
You can listen and watch this article on the PRODCAST. Like, Subscribe, and share to help us get the Gospel out to more people!
INTRODUCTION
Feminism is often presented as a noble struggle for women's rights, but beneath the surface, its deeper aims have been far more destructive. This article will take a hard look at feminism's origins and impact, particularly its role in shaping the policies of the Democratic Party, and explain why this movement represents a rebellion against God's created order.
We'll explore how feminism has undermined the family, distorted gender roles, and promoted ideologies that are in direct conflict with Biblical truth. From first-wave feminism to today's radical iterations, feminism has been a driving force in our cultural decline. As we trace its influence on modern policies—particularly those championed by the Democratic Party—we see how supporting these agendas not only leads to social disorder but also amounts to endorsing sin.
This isn't just about political theory; it's about spiritual consequences. Let's explore why supporting feminism and the political platforms that promote it is a matter of moral and theological concern.
THE HISTORY OF FEMINISM
FIRST WAVE FEMINISM
First-wave feminism, often idealized as a noble crusade for women's rights, is frequently presented in history as a pivotal movement in Western civilization. However, what is usually ignored is its darker side. This movement didn't merely seek justice but fundamentally subverted divine order, undermining societal foundations that had stood for centuries. Its challenge to patriarchal structures—structures that had been biblically ordained—ignited a social and spiritual revolution with destructive, far-reaching consequences.
At the heart of first-wave feminism was a rejection of the divinely ordained roles of men and women as outlined in Scripture. God created man and woman with distinct purposes (Genesis 2:18-24, Ephesians 5:22-33), appointing the man as head of the household and the woman as his complementary helpmate. Feminists, however, saw this structure as oppressive and sought to dismantle it. Leaders like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, in her Woman's Bible (1895), openly challenged biblical authority and sought to reinterpret Scripture in a way that denied male headship. Stanton and other early feminists rejected the biblical order of submission and headship, undermining not just gender roles but the authority of God Himself. This rebellion echoed the desire for autonomy seen in Genesis 3:5, where Satan's deception led to humanity's Fall.
One of the most damaging outcomes of this movement was its assault on the family. Early feminist figures such as Susan B. Anthony and Margaret Sanger (a key figure in early reproductive rights advocacy) advocated for women to pursue careers outside the home, thereby eroding the traditional family unit. Sanger, in particular, promoted birth control and argued for a woman's right to control her body, a concept that laid the groundwork for the eventual legalization of abortion. The home, designed by God as the primary sphere for women to nurture and raise the next generation, was devalued. In the name of "empowerment," women were removed from their God-given roles and placed in competition with men, destabilizing the family structure. As more women were encouraged to leave the home for work, children—once raised securely by their mothers—were increasingly left to the care of institutions. The traditional family, the bedrock of society, began to crumble.
This movement also promoted a dangerous philosophy of self-glorification. Feminists like Stanton and Anthony prioritized individual rights and ambitions above families, communities, and God. What started as a plea for "rights" quickly became a justification for self-indulgence, paving the way for later demands for abortion and sexual liberation. Scripture, however, teaches self-sacrifice and submission (Philippians 2:3-4, Ephesians 5:21), principles in direct opposition to the feminist pursuit of autonomy.
The legacy of first-wave feminism is seen in the social chaos it unleashed. What began with demands for suffrage—culminating in the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920—soon evolved into a broader rebellion against God's created order. The pursuit of equal property rights and suffrage, though legal in appearance, was not without spiritual consequences. Its later impact is evident in movements such as the sexual revolution, the widespread acceptance of abortion through Roe v. Wade (1973), and the erosion of traditional gender roles—all of which find their roots in this foundational revolt.
As feminism rose, Western civilization declined. With women leaving their homes to pursue careers, the family disintegrated, fertility rates plummeted, and the Church's influence weakened. The secularization of society followed as women abandoned their roles as homemakers and nurturers, leading to a vacuum in the home, where children were no longer catechized but handed over to secular institutions.
Ultimately, first-wave feminism paved the way for more radical forms of feminist ideology, which emerged in the 1960s. What began as a movement for legal rights became an all-out war against God's established order, revolutionizing not just society but the very nature of womanhood itself.
SECOND WAVE FEMINISM
Building on the groundwork laid by first-wave feminism, the second wave of the 1960s took the rebellion against God's order to an even greater extreme. While first-wave feminism had focused primarily on legal equality—such as voting rights and property ownership—the second-wave rapidly expanded its agenda to include a full-scale assault on society's moral and social structures. What initially appeared to be a movement for workplace equality and reproductive rights evolved into a campaign against the biblical roles of women in the family and society. Rejecting traditional values, second-wave feminists embraced sexual liberation and radical individualism, undermining the family unit and societal stability. What was framed as "liberation" enslaved women to a new kind of bondage—one characterized by selfishness, societal decay, and spiritual decline.
At its core, second-wave feminism rejected God-ordained femininity. Traditional roles as wives, mothers, and homemakers, previously respected even within the first wave, were now viewed as repressive and unnecessary. This movement, championed by figures like Betty Friedan, marked a sharp departure from earlier feminist goals. Friedan's book The Feminine Mystique (1963) became a defining manifesto, portraying homemakers as unfulfilled and soul-crushed, promoting careers over family as the true path to personal fulfillment. Unlike first-wave feminists who argued for fundamental civil rights, second-wave leaders sought to dismantle the family as the primary sphere of a woman's purpose. This marked a significant shift, as the family—particularly the woman's nurturing role within it—was directly attacked as outdated and oppressive.
This rebellion was not only against societal structures but also against God Himself. Scripture teaches that submission to a husband reflects Christ's relationship with the Church (Ephesians 5:22-24). Yet second-wave feminists valued autonomy and independence over biblical submission, masking rebellion in the language of "freedom" and "choice." With the rise of leaders like Gloria Steinem, feminism expanded its rhetoric to include the idea that traditional marriage and motherhood were traps, inhibiting women's freedom and fulfillment.
As the movement grew, it increasingly championed reproductive rights, with the right to abortion becoming a central demand. Roe v. Wade (1973) institutionalized abortion, framing it as a fundamental right of women. This decision, although framed as a victory for women's autonomy, was a clear violation of the Sixth Commandment (Exodus 20:13). What God designed as the womb for nurturing life became a place of death. Second-wave feminism's push for abortion was not only about reproductive choice but also part of its broader attack on the family and on biblical gender roles.
Key figures like Shulamith Firestone, author of The Dialectic of Sex (1970), called for the complete dismantling of the nuclear family and even proposed communal child-rearing. This radical vision saw the family as a primary source of women's oppression, advocating for state or community involvement in child-rearing instead. The ideas of Firestone, alongside those of Gloria Steinem, directly contributed to the rise of single motherhood, increased divorce rates, and the growing generational dysfunction that resulted from fatherless homes.
Sexual liberation became another central focus of the movement, glorifying promiscuity and severing sex from its God-given purposes of procreation and marital unity. This led to a host of societal ills—rising rates of sexually transmitted diseases, the breakdown of monogamy, and the objectification of women. What feminists heralded as "liberation" from traditional sexual norms turned into deeper bondage to sin (Romans 6:16) as women became increasingly disconnected from the biblical vision of marriage and family.
Radical individualism further eroded family and community. Women were encouraged to prioritize personal fulfillment over service to others (Philippians 2:3-4), leading to weakened marriages, neglected children, and the disintegration of community bonds. Where first-wave feminists argued for women's participation in public life while often upholding the family, second-wave feminists rejected the home entirely as a woman's place of fulfillment. What was portrayed as strength became isolation and loneliness, as women lost the relationships that bring true fulfillment—family, community, and dependence on God.
In its pursuit of autonomy, second-wave feminism's rejection of biblical truth fostered a nihilistic worldview, leaving women spiritually and emotionally adrift, devoid of purpose. The seeds of rebellion planted by first-wave feminists bore bitter fruit in this period, as sexual liberation and radical individualism continued dismantling Western society's foundations. This stage of feminism paved the way for the even more extreme third wave, which would go on to challenge gender, morality, and identity in ways that would plunge society deeper into confusion and rebellion against God's order.
THIRD WAVE FEMINISM
Emerging in the 1990s, third-wave feminism took the rebellion against God's created order to unprecedented levels. While the first wave fought for legal equality and the second wave for workplace rights and reproductive autonomy, the third wave became a cultural force that denied the very essence of male and female. Prominent feminists of this era, such as Judith Butler, argued that gender is not biologically determined but socially constructed, introducing the concept of gender fluidity and setting the stage for the transgender movement. Butler's influential work Gender Trouble (1990) questioned the fixed nature of gender, rejecting the biblical truth of Genesis 1:27—that God created man and woman distinct and complementary.
This wave's outright denial of biological realities paved the way for movements that encouraged individuals to reject their God-given identities. The rise of gender reassignment surgeries and hormonal treatments reflects a culture that has embraced body mutilation as a means of expressing so-called "freedom." Instead of acknowledging the biblical truth that our identities are found in God's design, third-wave feminists promoted the belief that identity could be self-created, resulting in a deep crisis of confusion and despair.
In addition to this rejection of biology, third-wave feminism glorified sexual perversion. Promiscuity, pornography, and even prostitution were rebranded as forms of "empowerment." Movements such as "slut walks," which began in 2011, sought to challenge societal norms by encouraging women to take pride in sexual promiscuity. In stark contrast to biblical teachings on sexual purity (1 Corinthians 6:18-20), third-wave feminism elevated self-gratification and bodily autonomy over God's standards. This led to a culture that celebrated sexual freedom while ignoring its devastating consequences, including the rise of sexually transmitted diseases, human trafficking, and the normalization of the hookup culture.
A key component of third-wave feminism was the promotion of intersectionality, a concept popularized by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989. Intersectionality sought to address the overlapping systems of oppression related to race, gender, class, and sexuality, but it also created a culture of victimhood. Feminists began to divide society into categories of oppressor and oppressed, focusing on individual grievances rather than collective truth. This identity politics rejected biblical virtues such as humility, forgiveness, and unity (James 4:10, Matthew 6:14-15) in favor of blame, entitlement, and division. Society fractured further as third-wave feminism encouraged women to see themselves as perpetual victims, further stoking animosity toward men and traditional structures.
As third-wave feminism dismantled traditional moral norms, it also sought to silence any opposition. Feminists of this era became proponents of censorship, using accusations of "hate speech" to stifle dissenting views. College campuses became battlegrounds for free speech, with figures like Christina Hoff Sommers and Camille Paglia—feminists themselves—facing protests and disruptions for daring to critique feminist orthodoxy. This suppression of debate reflected the movement's inability to withstand scrutiny, a clear deviation from the biblical call to reason and discernment (Proverbs 18:15).
FOURTH WAVE FEMINISM
The fourth wave, which emerged in the 2010s, took advantage of social media and digital platforms to amplify the ideologies of the third wave. With the rise of Twitter, Instagram, and other platforms, feminists weaponized outrage and cancel culture, seeking to enforce ideological conformity through online activism. The #MeToo movement, which began in 2017 and initially aimed to expose sexual harassment and assault, quickly devolved into a platform where accusations alone could destroy careers and reputations, often without due process. While exposing abuse is commendable, the movement's failure to uphold biblical principles of justice—such as requiring two or three witnesses (Deuteronomy 19:15)—revealed the dangers of relying solely on social media outrage.
In addition, fourth-wave feminism fully embraced the transgender movement, championing biological men who identify as women. This led to controversies in sports, where male athletes like Lia Thomas were allowed to compete in women's categories, displacing and dominating female athletes. Feminists like Judith Butler and organizations like the ACLU endorsed these policies despite the clear harm done to biological women. What was once a movement advocating for women's rights now became a vehicle for erasing the very concept of womanhood.
Fourth-wave feminism also amplified intersectionality to such an extreme that it fractured itself into smaller identity groups. Instead of uniting women under a common cause, the movement splintered based on race, gender identity, and sexuality, each group vying for the status of "most oppressed." Feminists who failed to conform to radical transgender ideologies were often labeled as "TERFs" (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists) and ostracized by their own movement for defending the biological reality of womanhood. This internal division further undermined the credibility and coherence of the feminist cause.
Moreover, fourth-wave feminism's elevation of "lived experience" over objective truth fostered a culture where feelings became the highest authority. Universities, once centers of intellectual debate, became echo chambers of feminist and progressive orthodoxy, where "safe spaces" and "trigger warnings" shielded students from ideas that challenged their fragile worldviews. This rejection of reason and truth is a direct affront to biblical wisdom (Proverbs 14:15), as it undermines the ability to discern right from wrong, leading to a society where even basic biological facts are subject to personal interpretation.
Both third and fourth-wave feminism represents a full-scale war against God's order. As these movements collapse under the weight of their contradictions, they leave behind a society fractured by confusion and rebellion, where truth is abandoned in favor of lies. The cultural chaos we see today is the direct result of this ongoing rejection of biblical gender roles, the sanctity of life, and the God-given distinctions between male and female.
EXAMPLES OF FEMINISM IN CULTURE
Modern feminism, far from a mere quest for "equality," has reached disturbing new heights, pushing society into chaos, confusion, and moral decay. The movement now embraces radical ideologies that defy biological realities, undermine traditional values, and obliterate fundamental truths. Let's examine how feminism, championed by Democrats, Hollywood, and the mainstream media, has eroded our culture.
Lia Thomas
One of the most blatant examples of modern feminism's impact is the case of Lia Thomas, a biological male competing in women's swimming at the University of Pennsylvania. Thomas, displacing female athletes and winning championships, sparked national outrage over fairness in women's sports. Feminism's unyielding support for transgender inclusion in female athletics is erasing the very women it claims to uplift. Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, continue to push policies that allow transgender athletes to dominate women's sports, marginalizing biological women in spaces they fought to create.
Ketanji Brown Jackson
During her 2022 Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Ketanji Brown Jackson was asked to define "woman" and could not provide an answer. This moment exposed the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of feminist ideology today. Senator Ted Cruz highlighted that this confusion is a direct product of the Democratic Party's embrace of radical feminist dogma. If even a Supreme Court nominee, supported by Democrats, cannot define basic biological terms, it reveals how feminism has abandoned reason, embracing an agenda that denies even the most elementary truths.
What Is a Woman?
Matt Walsh's 2022 documentary What is a Woman? shines a harsh light on modern feminism's incoherence. Walsh asks feminists and academics alike to define "woman"—and they fail miserably. The inability of so-called experts to answer such a simple question is proof of feminism's rejection of biological reality. Under feminist pressure, society is now subjected to the absurd idea that gender is fluid, subjective, and ultimately meaningless. This is not just an academic crisis; the Biden Administration has embraced this confusion, further legitimizing this harmful ideology.
San Francisco Spa
In 2021, a biological male identifying as a woman exposed himself in front of women and young girls at a San Francisco spa, igniting outrage. Feminist-endorsed policies, which allow biological men access to women's private spaces, jeopardize the safety and dignity of women. Feminists, alongside Democratic leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, aggressively push these policies, framing opposition as discriminatory, even when the rights and safety of women are clearly at risk.
Men in Women's Prisons
In 2021, California passed a law allowing biological men who identify as women to be housed in women's prisons. The predictable result? Sexual assaults against female inmates. Feminists, in their ideological fervor, supported this policy without regard for its horrific consequences. Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed the law, illustrating how the Democrats' blind pursuit of gender equality has led to dangerous, irrational outcomes that victimize the very women feminism claims to protect.
Drag Queen Story Hour
Public libraries across America have hosted "Drag Queen Story Hour," where drag performers read to young children. What should be a matter of concern for all is hailed by feminists and their Hollywood allies as a celebration of diversity. Michelle Obama and other Democratic figures have championed these events as inclusive despite their inappropriate, highly sexualized nature. Feminism's obsession with gender fluidity has paved the way for the normalization of exposing minors to adult-themed performances and sexualizing children in the process.
Texas Custody Battle
A high-profile 2021 custody battle in Texas revealed the terrifying reach of feminist ideology. A father fought to prevent his son from being transitioned into a girl, while the mother sought to proceed with the child's transition. Feminists have consistently supported laws that enable children to transition without parental consent, leaving parents powerless to protect their children. Figures like Hillary Clinton have endorsed these policies, stripping parents of their right to safeguard their children from dangerous, irreversible treatments.
Rachel Levine's Appointment
In 2021, Dr. Rachel Levine, a biological male identifying as a woman, was appointed Assistant Secretary for Health. Levine's promotion of puberty blockers and gender transitions for minors is deeply troubling, yet feminists celebrated this as a victory for "women's rights." Feminism's alignment with transgender ideology has furthered confusion and disorder in government policy, with Democratic leaders celebrating Levine's appointment and endorsing policies that threaten the health and safety of children.
The Hot Potato Democrats
The Democratic Party, through its embrace of radical feminism, has become the engine driving these dangerous ideologies. Like the game of hot potato, when the music of cultural decay finally stops, the ones left holding the "potato"—the responsibility for the moral and societal destruction—will be the Democrats, and the evidence is undeniable. From erasing biological distinctions to promoting transgender policies, Democrats have shown that they are the party of feminism in its most extreme form. Leaders like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have championed policies that prioritize gender identity over reality, self-empowerment over moral responsibility, and emotional fragility over free speech. By advancing feminism's agenda, the Democratic Party is complicit in America's moral and cultural collapse. Once cloaked in the language of equality, feminism has metastasized into a force of chaos, undermining truth, dismantling the family, and pushing America deeper into spiritual and societal decay.
THE BIBLICAL VIEW OF WOMANHOOD
MALE HEADSHIP
To rightly understand biblical womanhood, we must begin with the doctrine of headship, which lies at the heart of God's design for order and flourishing. Scripture reveals a divinely instituted hierarchy where men are appointed by God to lead in the family, the Church, and society with selfless love and responsibility. Far from oppressive, this structure promotes peace, order, and godly living. In contrast, a rejection of male headship—evident in movements like modern feminism—ushers in disorder in the home, confusion within the Church, and widespread cultural decay.
Headship Established at Creation
The foundation of male headship is not a mere cultural construct but a creation ordinance. Genesis 1-2 teaches that Adam formed first, was entrusted with tending the garden and receiving God's direct commands (Genesis 2:7, 18-24). Eve was made as Adam's helper—complementing, not competing with him. Adam's naming of Eve (Genesis 2:23) highlights his authority, which is further affirmed by the Apostle Paul in 1 Timothy 2:12-13, where he grounds male leadership in creation itself, transcending cultural trends or societal norms.
Headship Confirmed Through the Fall
The Fall, detailed in Genesis 3, only reinforces the principle of male headship. Although Eve was deceived first, God sought Adam, holding him accountable for the breach (Genesis 3:9). Paul clarifies this in Romans 5:12-19, explaining that sin entered the world through one man, Adam—not Eve. This underscores the profound spiritual responsibility placed upon men to lead their households toward righteousness, for as head of his home, Adam's failure affected the entire human race.
Headship Modeled by Christ: Servant Leadership
Male headship is not about authoritarian control but Christ-like, sacrificial leadership. The New Testament presents the husband's role as a reflection of Christ's relationship with His Church (Ephesians 5:22-25). This leadership is marked by humility and service, not dominance. Husbands are called to lead their wives by prioritizing their well-being and demonstrating sacrificial love, just as Christ gave Himself up for His bride. True headship involves putting others' needs first and guiding them in spiritual growth and grace.
Headship in the Family and the Church
The order of male leadership is clearly prescribed in the family and the Church. In 1 Corinthians 11:3, Paul teaches that the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the Church. This leadership entails spiritual guidance and care, with husbands called to nurture the faith of their households. Likewise, in the Church, Scripture firmly upholds male headship in roles of teaching and authority. In 1 Timothy 2:12-14, women are prohibited from exercising authority over men in the Church, affirming that the offices of elders and pastors are reserved for qualified men.
Consequences of Forsaking God's Order
As seen from the very beginning, the rejection of male headship results in disorder and chaos. Adam's passivity in leading Eve led to the Fall of mankind. Today, feminism's rejection of biblical submission has produced similar consequences: fractured families, widespread fatherlessness, and societal disintegration. Isaiah 3:12 illustrates the disastrous effects of improper leadership, where women and children usurp the role of men, leading to ruin. Biblical male leadership is essential for the flourishing of the family and society.
Male Leadership in Society
The scope of male headship extends beyond the home and the Church into society, where men are called to lead in governance, civic responsibilities, and warfare. Scripture consistently portrays men as the primary leaders in these domains, from the leaders chosen in Deuteronomy 1:13-15 to the elders at the city gate in Ruth 4:1-2. Deuteronomy 22:5 even forbids women from adopting roles specifically designed for men, such as military duties, reinforcing the distinctiveness of male and female responsibilities.
Christ: The Supreme Model of Headship
Ultimately, male headship is a reflection of Christ's own authority and love over His Church. In Colossians 1:18 and Ephesians 5:23, Christ is presented as the head of the Church, leading His bride with unmatched love, authority, and sacrifice. Rejecting male headship is, therefore, a rejection of the authority of Christ Himself. God's design for headship is not an arbitrary rule but a reflection of His own nature and order. When men lead as Christ led—selflessly and sacrificially—they reflect the very heart of God's authority and love in the world.
WHAT IS A WOMAN?
From the beginning, womanhood is revealed as a unique and vital part of God's perfect design. Genesis 1:27 tells us, "God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." The Hebrew word for "image" (tselem) speaks to the inherent dignity and worth that both men and women share as bearers of God's likeness. Yet, within this shared image-bearing, God distinguishes their roles, reflecting not inequality but complementarity. The woman, 'ezer kenegdo (Genesis 2:18), is described as a "helper fit for" man, a phrase that conveys profound strength and purpose. The word 'ezer is often used to describe God as a helper to Israel (e.g., Psalm 33:20), showing that a woman's role is far from passive or insignificant. Rather, it speaks to her active, powerful role in partnership with man, providing essential strength and support.
The act of creating a woman from a man's rib (Genesis 2:22) highlights both unity and distinction. The Hebrew term for "rib," tsela, can also mean "side," symbolizing the closeness and equality of woman to man while at the same time acknowledging their distinct roles within the created order. This complementary design is further expounded in Ephesians 5:22-24, where Paul explains that the relationship between husband and wife mirrors the relationship between Christ and the Church. The Greek word for submission, hypotassō, does not imply forced subjugation but a willing, voluntary alignment under the authority of another for the sake of harmony and order. Just as Christ's headship over the Church is marked by sacrificial love, so is man's headship, characterized by selfless care and devotion. This mutual respect and love create an environment where both men and women flourish according to their God-given design.
THE BEAUTY AND GLORY OF WOMANHOOD
Biblical womanhood is not a position of inferiority or insignificance but one of beauty, strength, and honor. The Proverbs 31 woman is often cited as the archetype of godly femininity. However, a deeper study of the text reveals the profound nature of her role. The word used in Proverbs 31:10, chayil (translated as "excellent" or "virtuous"), is a term often used to describe warriors, indicating that this woman is not merely virtuous but strong, capable, and resilient. Her worth is "far above jewels" (Proverbs 31:10), and she is praised for her wisdom (hokmah), industriousness, and fear of the Lord (yirat Yahweh), qualities that bring blessing not only to her household but also to her community.
Her influence extends beyond her home. In Proverbs 31:16, she "considers a field and buys it," showing her wisdom in financial matters and her contribution to her family's prosperity. Her hands are described as working with "delight"(Proverbs 31:13), and she "extends her hand to the poor" (Proverbs 31:20), reflecting her generous spirit. Far from being confined to domestic tasks, this woman engages in business, charity, and the spiritual nurture of her family. She exemplifies how biblical womanhood encompasses strength, intelligence, and grace.
Ephesians 5:22-24 further reveals that submission in marriage is not about losing one's identity or value. The Greek word for "love" used in this passage, agapē, signifies a self-sacrificial love that seeks the well-being of the other. This means that submission reflects Christ's loving relationship with His Church—a relationship built on trust, love, and mutual respect. Submission, therefore, is a profound act of faith in God's order, a role of great dignity that mirrors Christ's submission to the Father, which led to the salvation of mankind (Philippians 2:5-8).
THE HIGH CALLING OF MOTHERHOOD AND HOME
Motherhood, as presented in Scripture, is one of the most sacred and high callings given to women. Titus 2:3-5 encourages older women to "teach what is good" and to train younger women to love their husbands and children. The word for "teach what is good" (kalodidaskalos) emphasizes that women are entrusted with a moral and spiritual teaching role, imparting wisdom to the next generation. Far from being restrictive, this role elevates women to positions of profound influence as they shape the future of their families, the Church, and society through their godly example.
Motherhood extends far beyond the biological bearing of children. In 1 Timothy 2:15, Paul writes that "women will be saved through childbearing," a passage often misunderstood. The Greek word teknogonia refers not merely to the act of childbirth but to the nurturing and raising of children. This calling is not limited to physical motherhood but includes spiritual motherhood, where women impart life, wisdom, and virtue to those they disciple and care for. This high calling reflects God's nurturing character (Isaiah 49:15), showing that women participate in the divine work of raising and shaping future generations in the fear and admonition of the Lord.
Contrary to the claims of feminism, which often sees the home as stifling or secondary, Scripture affirms that managing a household is a powerful role with eternal significance. The home is where godly values are instilled, children learn about Christ, and the light of the Gospel shines in everyday life. Proverbs 14:1 says, "The wise woman builds her house, but the foolish tears it down with her own hands." A godly woman who loves and cares for her family is a builder of homes, societies, and nations.
THE INNER STRENGTH OF WOMANHOOD
The biblical vision of womanhood emphasizes inner beauty and strength, which transcend outward appearance. First, Peter 3:3-4 exhorts women not to focus on external adornment but on the "hidden person of the heart," where true beauty is found. The Greek word kosmos, often translated as "adornment," points to the idea of ordering one's life according to God's purposes. The inner beauty Peter describes is cultivated through a quiet and gentle spirit (praus kai hēsychios pneuma), qualities that reflect Christ's own meekness and submission to the Father.
This inner strength is not weakness but power under control. The Greek word for "gentle" (praus) is often used to describe a tamed horse, suggesting strength that is disciplined and directed by God. This strength enables women to endure hardship, serve others, and trust in God's sovereign care, no matter the circumstances. This inner fortitude, rooted in faith, enables women to fulfill their God-given roles with grace and dignity, whether in marriage, motherhood, or singleness.
SUBMISSION AND HEADSHIP IN THE ORDERED HOME
When properly understood, the biblical framework of submission and headship creates harmony and flourishing within the home. Ephesians 5:22-24 teaches that wives are to submit to their husbands "as to the Lord." This does not mean blind obedience or inferiority but a willing partnership where the husband leads in love, and the wife responds in respect and support. The Greek word kephalē (head) used in Ephesians conveys the idea of source and leadership, indicating that the husband's role is to lead, guide, and protect his family, just as Christ leads and protects His Church.
When men lead with sacrificial love and women submit in godly trust, families thrive, reflecting the divine order that brings peace and stability. This order is grounded in creation itself (1 Timothy 2:13), where Adam was formed first, and Eve was created as his helper, a role that brings honor and dignity rather than subjugation. Rejecting this order leads to disorder, as seen in the societal breakdowns caused by the rejection of biblical gender roles.
The Church also upholds this principle, where women are called to serve faithfully under men's leadership. 1 Timothy 2:12-14 clarifies that this structure is not culturally bound but rooted in creation, reflecting the larger truth of Christ's headship over the Church. By submitting to godly leadership, women play a vital role in the order and mission of the Church, bringing unity, peace, and flourishing to the body of Christ.
REJECTING FEMINISM FOR GOD'S GLORY
At its core, feminism promotes a rebellion against God's design for men and women, advocating for autonomy, self-determination, and rejection of divine order. The movement's celebration of abortion as a "right" reveals its ultimate rejection of life itself, violating the commandment "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13) and disregarding the sanctity of the unborn, as celebrated in Psalm 139. The exaltation of autonomy over submission has led to the erosion of family structures and societal chaos.
True freedom for women is found not in rebellion but in embracing God's design. Biblical womanhood is a path to peace, fulfillment, and eternal significance. Proverbs 31 illustrates that a godly woman builds up her household, nurtures her children, and strengthens her community, all while reflecting the glory of her Creator. This is the vision the Church must uphold and promote, encouraging women to reject the destructive lies of feminism and embrace the beauty and purpose of their God-given roles.
WHY VOTING DEMOCRAT IS A SIN
In light of everything we've discussed, it is abundantly clear that feminism—now fully embraced and championed by the Democratic Party—represents a rebellion against God's created order. Voting for this party is not just a political decision; it is a direct endorsement of the ideologies that attack the very foundation of biblical truth, womanhood, and family. Feminism, through its pursuit of autonomy, sexual liberation, and the destruction of gender roles, has led to the erosion of the family, the subjugation of children to dangerous ideologies, and the widespread acceptance of abortion—murder in the eyes of God.
To vote for the Democratic Party is to sin against women, stripping them of the dignity that comes from embracing their God-given roles as helpers, mothers, and nurturers. It forces women into the mold of rebellion, self-glorification, and confusion, all under the guise of empowerment. Feminism has sold a lie, and the Democratic Party has become the vessel through which this lie spreads.
But more than that, voting for the Democrats is a sin against God. It is a rejection of His created order, a rebellion against His authority, and a submission to a culture of death and chaos. When we cast our votes, we make a moral decision that either aligns us with God's truth or sets us against it.
So I ask you—no, I challenge you—do not fall into the trap of thinking your vote is inconsequential. Your vote is a reflection of where your heart stands about God's will. Will you stand with the Word of God, or will you side with a party that promotes rebellion, sin, and destruction? The choice is clear, and the consequences are eternal.
Now is the time for action. Reject the lies of feminism and the Democratic Party. Stand up for biblical womanhood, the sanctity of life, and God's authority. Take a stand for truth—both in the voting booth and in every sphere of life.
