#8 Sex Education: Ten Reasons Why Voting Democrat is a Sin
You can listen and watch this article on the PRODCAST. Like, Subscribe, and share to help us get the Gospel out to more people!
INTRODUCTION
We are in a highly contentious and consequential election season where the future of the country is on the ballot. The goal of this series is to cut through the lies and emotional manipulation in order to equip God's people with ten concrete reasons why voting for the Democratic Party is immoral, harmful to the nation, and ultimately a sin against God. Unless the Democratic Party experiences a profound repentance and turns away from almost everything that defines it, there is no way for a Christian, without engaging in serious moral contortions, to justify casting a vote for such a wicked and destructive organization.
The purpose here is not merely to convince those who already oppose the Democratic Party, but to provide the biblical and moral arguments needed to help those who are struggling with these issues. Many Christians are wrestling with the Democratic Party’s façade of empathy and compassion, which contrasts sharply with the bold and often controversial rhetoric of Donald Trump. On the surface, the Democrats may appear more reasonable, but their policies are steeped in deception and anti-biblical principles that Christians must reject.
This series is meant to provide you with the information and arguments to help others see the truth about the Democratic Party. It's not enough to privately reject their policies; we need to stand together in proclaiming why this party must be rejected, and how Christians can actively work to end its influence and restore this nation under Christ's kingship.
In this post, we will cover Reason 8: The Democratic Party’s Role in Corrupting Sex Education in Public Schools—one of the most egregious examples of how the Democrats have embraced moral decay, targeting the innocence of children and undermining the biblical responsibility of parents.
THE SECULAR FOUNDATION OF EDUCATION
Aristotle once remarked, "The citizen should be molded to suit the form of government under which he lives." ^1 His insight highlights a stark reality: education is never neutral—it always shapes individuals to fit the values of the society that governs it. Contrast this with the vision of the early Puritans in America, who understood education not as a tool for conforming to worldly powers, but as a sacred duty centered on the family and the church. For them, literacy was not merely a path to success in society but a gateway to knowing God through Scripture.^2 Their goal was not to produce citizens molded by earthly governments but to raise up God-fearing men and women rooted in biblical truth and prepared to lead lives of virtue under the authority of Christ.
Biblically, the responsibility for educating children falls squarely on the parents, with help from the church. Scripture doesn't give the state any authority in this sacred task. Deuteronomy 6:6-9 is clear: "These words, which I am commanding you today, shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your sons…" Here, God commands parents—not the government—to teach their children His ways. This is echoed in Ephesians 6:4, where fathers are told to raise their children in the "discipline and instruction of the Lord."
Ass 1 Timothy 3:15 puts it, the church's role is to be "the pillar and foundation of the truth," offering spiritual support and doctrinal guidance, but not taking over the parents' responsibility. So, in this design, the family is the primary educator, with the church as a partner. The state is never mentioned as having a role in the education of children.
Even in an ideal world—a Christian nation with Christian leaders, schools, teachers, and curricula—the Bible doesn't hand the job of education to the state. It leaves that responsibility to parents, with the church assisting. So, while Christian schooling can be acceptable, it must involve parents and be under the guidance of the church to ensure it stays faithful to the biblical model.
Unfortunately, the rise of secular education in America has destroyed this biblical vision. Things began to change in the 19th century because of Enlightenment thinkers like Horace Mann. Mann, a strong advocate of secularism, pushed for government control of education, taking away the God-given role of parents and the church.^3 His vision of universal education wasn't built on biblical principles but on a desire to mold children into citizens of a secular state, echoing Aristotle's idea that the state should shape its citizens to fit its government. Mann's work laid the foundation for today's public school system, which has drifted further into promoting godless values and moral confusion.
A SORDID HISTORY AND WEAPON OF INDOCTRINATION
Since the time of Horace Mann, the public education system has increasingly fallen into the hands of secularists, transforming it into a tool of state indoctrination. This shift was not accidental. It moved away from a biblically grounded curriculum to one that deliberately promotes secularism, relativism, and atheism. John Dewey, often called the father of modern education, was an outspoken atheist and socialist. He believed that education should be used for social engineering rather than cultivating moral virtue. Under Dewey's influence, American schools became laboratories for progressive ideology, replacing God's timeless truth with the ever-shifting doctrines of man.
One of the clearest examples of this indoctrination is the removal of prayer and Bible reading from public schools in the 1960s, driven by landmark cases like Engel v. Vitale and Abington School District v. Schempp. These rulings didn't just remove religious activities; they signaled the state's intent to push God out of the classroom, leaving a vacuum that was swiftly filled by secular humanism.
Today, public schools have gone even further. Children are now being taught that gender is a social construct, that marriage isn't reserved for a man and a woman, and that sexual freedom is merely an expression of self-identity. Programs like Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), promoted by Planned Parenthood and endorsed by the United Nations, are exposing young children to explicit content, grooming them for a life of sexual immorality. In some states, this curriculum is introduced as early as kindergarten, teaching ideas that not only contradict biblical truth but also destroy the innocence of children.
Take Massachusetts as an example. State law mandates sex education programs that teach children about contraception, abortion access, and alternative sexual lifestyles. Planned Parenthood, a central figure in shaping this curriculum, has infiltrated schools nationwide under the guise of providing "healthcare education." But their true agenda is to normalize sexual promiscuity and undermine traditional family values.^4
Moreover, Critical Race Theory (CRT), a Marxist ideology, has entered classrooms under the banner of "anti-racism." CRT teaches children that their value is based on their race, not their character, and advances the divisive narrative that America is inherently and irredeemably racist. This ideology directly opposes the biblical truth that all people are made in the image of God and are equal in His eyes (Genesis 1:27; Galatians 3:28).^5
The public school system has been weaponized by the state to shape children into citizens who reflect its secular image, not the image of God. Schools have ceased to be places of learning and have become battlegrounds for the hearts and minds of the next generation. The message is loud and clear: "Your children belong to us." But this is a lie straight from the pit of hell. When Jesus tells us to "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" (Matthew 22:21), He is talking about taxes—not our children. Our children belong to God, who has entrusted us as parents to raise them in His ways.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A TOOL OF TYRANNY
Public schools have become weapons wielded by an authoritarian state, seeking to mold children into loyal subjects of a secular, godless regime. This is not an exaggeration—the evidence is overwhelming. Schools across the country are pushing for conformity to state-approved values on gender, sexuality, race, and politics while punishing those who dare to dissent. For example, many school districts now require teachers to use preferred pronouns for students, even if it contradicts the teacher's personal beliefs. In states like California, parents are often not informed if their child decides to identify as a different gender while at school. This aggressive push for ideological conformity has silenced many who stand against these mandates.^6
Take the example of a middle school student in Massachusetts who was punished simply for wearing a shirt that stated, "There are only two genders." Despite this being a scientifically and biblically grounded belief, the school deemed it offensive and punished him, even though he was expressing his Christian faith. This incident is not an isolated case but part of a larger trend to marginalize and suppress Christian beliefs in the public square. The public school system has become openly hostile to Christianity, advancing ideologies that directly contradict the Gospel.
The results of this indoctrination are devastating. Many Christian parents send their children to public schools, hoping they will be "salt and light," but find that their children come home indoctrinated with worldly values. No general would ever send a soldier into battle without first sending them through rigorous basic training. Childhood is the boot camp for our children. We cannot expect to send them out into a hostile world unprepared and unequipped and believe they will be successful. Studies have shown that a significant percentage of children raised in Christian homes who attend public schools abandon their faith by the time they reach adulthood.^7 The system is designed to turn children away from their parents, away from the church, and ultimately, away from God.
It's time for Christian parents to recognize the truth: public schools are not neutral. They are battlegrounds where the state seeks to mold the next generation into its own secular image. We cannot hand over our most precious resource—our children—to Caesar. The Bible calls us to take responsibility for their education, to raise them in the fear and instruction of the Lord, with the church's support. Anything less is a betrayal of the sacred trust God has given us as parents.
FOR THE LOVE OF NEIGHBOR
As Christians, we are called to care not only for our own children but also for the well-being of others. This love compels us to protect our children and also to seek the safety of those who remain blind to the dangers of public education. To truly love our neighbor means taking action—ensuring that political leaders do not drive society's children off a moral cliff, especially in the area of sexual ethics, where the Democratic Party has led a horrifying charge into depravity.
THE BREEDING GROUNDS FOR SEXUAL DEVIANCY
It's no secret that the public school system has not only failed to uphold moral values but has actively promoted the hyper-sexualization of children. What was once a system of basic education has now become a breeding ground for sexual deviants, who, in turn, raise future generations to continue the cycle. This transformation didn't happen in isolation; it was the result of deliberate actions by individuals and institutions aiming to dismantle traditional moral values.
JUSTIFICATION FOR SEX EDUCATION AND MARGARET SANGER
Now, let's take a look at how this all started. The introduction of sex education into public schools was initially justified as a response to public health concerns. In the early 20th century, there were rising rates of sexually transmitted diseases, especially among soldiers and young adults. Public health officials argued that teaching about sex in schools would help curb the spread of diseases like syphilis and gonorrhea. This push became even stronger during World War I, when returning soldiers were plagued with STIs, and the government used this as a reason to implement sex education programs.
But beneath this veneer of public health concerns, a far more insidious agenda was brewing—one shaped by none other than Margaret Sanger. Sanger, who would go on to found Planned Parenthood, is often hailed as a pioneer of women's reproductive rights. However, the truth about her life and beliefs paints a much darker picture. She wasn't just advocating for sex education to prevent STIs; she was using it as a vehicle to promote her twisted philosophy of eugenics, sexual autonomy, and societal control.
Sanger's views on race were horrifying. She was a committed eugenicist who openly supported the idea of racial purity and selective breeding of the "fit" population. She believed in using birth control and sterilization to prevent certain groups—racial minorities and the poor—from reproducing. In her 1922 book, The Pivot of Civilization, she argued that birth control was essential to limiting the reproduction of people she deemed "unfit" and "feebleminded." ^8 Her infamous "Negro Project," launched in 1939, was designed to reduce the African-American birth rate through widespread distribution of birth control.^9 She even enlisted black leaders to help with this project, writing in a letter, "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." ^10
Her obsession with controlling the reproduction of non-white populations was so extreme that she openly praised the eugenic policies of Nazi Germany, admiring their use of sterilization for racial control.^11 It's no exaggeration to say that Margaret Sanger's ideology shared roots with the very ideas that fueled the Holocaust.
But her moral corruption didn't stop there. Sanger led a life of sexual debauchery, participating in orgies and pursuing countless sexual escapades. She viewed traditional Christian sexual ethics as oppressive and advocated for a world where women could engage in sex without the consequences of marriage and motherhood.^12 She abandoned her own children to chase this lifestyle, proving that her ideas about sexual liberation were not about empowerment but selfish indulgence. How could a woman who rejected her own role as a mother possibly have the moral authority to shape the way children are educated about sex?
By promoting contraception, abortion, and promiscuity, Sanger laid the groundwork for a sexually liberated society—one that separated sex from morality and family. Her vision crept into the public school system, where sex education quickly evolved from focusing on health and hygiene to teaching sexual autonomy and exploration. Under the banner of "empowerment," Sanger and her followers sought to indoctrinate children with the idea that sexual pleasure was a right, divorced from the sanctity of marriage or the responsibilities of reproduction.
By the 1960s, during the height of the sexual revolution, schools began incorporating content that not only normalized but encouraged sexual exploration. They began teaching that contraception and abortion were acceptable choices and that sexual activity, regardless of marital status, was healthy and natural. Sanger's dream of a society freed from the "oppressive" bonds of Christian morality was becoming a reality, and public schools were the vehicle driving it forward.
This shift created a school environment where young people weren't just informed about sexual health; they were being taught that sexual experimentation and promiscuity were desirable. The moral guardrails that once defined sexual behavior—guardrails rooted in Scripture and designed to protect the family—were systematically dismantled. As a result, public schools became a breeding ground for the behaviors that Sanger herself embodied: sexual libertinism and a rejection of traditional moral values.
Even more shocking is how modern-day Democrats continue to revere Sanger despite her well-documented racism and eugenicist views. In 2009, Hillary Clinton famously said, "I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision." ^13 Clinton even compared Sanger's work in reproductive rights to the civil rights movement, ignoring the fact that Sanger's "Negro Project" was explicitly designed to curb the birth rate of black Americans. Such statements aren't just ignorant; they are hypocritical, given that Sanger's entire life's work was rooted in the dehumanization of minority populations.
Planned Parenthood, the organization Sanger founded, continues to carry on her legacy. It promotes abortion and is heavily involved in shaping sex education programs across America.^14 The fact that public school sex education is based on the ideas of a woman who abandoned her children, promoted racial purity, and lived a life of sexual indulgence should terrify any parent who cares about their kids. Who in their right mind would allow their children to be exposed to a curriculum influenced by someone like her?
Sanger's life—marked by promiscuity, orgies, abandoning her children, and promoting racial eugenics—should disqualify her from being considered a role model. Yet, she is lauded by many on the political left as a hero. The very fact that our public school systems embrace curricula influenced by her sick and twisted legacy shows just how far we've strayed from moral sanity.
ALFRED KINSEY AND THE PERVERSION OF SEX EDUCATION
At the heart of the transformation of sex education in America lies Alfred Kinsey, a figure whose so-called "research" on human sexuality has profoundly altered the direction of public education. Kinsey, originally a zoologist, published two significant reports: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). These reports were hailed as groundbreaking at the time but have since been exposed as deeply flawed, unethical, and criminal in their methods.
One of the most disturbing aspects of Kinsey's work was his documentation of child sexuality, particularly his grotesque and false claim that children, including infants, could experience orgasm. His infamous "Table 34" in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male recorded the abuse of children and infants, some as young as five months old, detailing their supposed "orgasmic" responses.^15 This data was obtained through the abuse of children by pedophiles—whom Kinsey not only interviewed but encouraged in their heinous acts. One such pedophile, Rex King, meticulously documented his abuse of children for Kinsey's research, and Kinsey himself even commended King for his "research spirit." ^16
Kinsey's defense of child molestation was not limited to his collaboration with abusers. In 1949, he testified before the California General Assembly's Subcommittee on Sex Crimes, where he argued for the liberalization of sex offense statutes and advocated for the immediate parole of child molesters.^17 Kinsey infamously claimed that children were not harmed by molestation unless "cultural conditioning" made them believe they should be. His words were chilling: "It is difficult to understand why a child, except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched." ^18 This statement reveals a disturbing agenda to normalize pedophilia, framing it as a harmless, or even beneficial, act.
Kinsey's personal life was no less troubling. According to his official biography, Kinsey engaged in extreme sexual behaviors, including circumcising himself with a pocketknife without anesthesia.^19 He also encouraged his staff to engage in group sexual activities, which he filmed for supposed "scientific" purposes in his attic.^20 Kinsey manipulated his colleagues into participating in these acts, warning them that constant sexual activity would desensitize them—an observation he later used to justify further sexual experimentation. Psychiatrist Dr. Miriam Grossman has commented on Kinsey's disturbed psyche, describing him as a "depraved human being" whose emotional illness expressed itself through his sexuality.^21
Kinsey's research on child sexuality and his collaboration with pedophiles like Rex King reveals the true nature of his work. It was not an objective study of human behavior but rather the promotion and normalization of sexual deviance. His research was not only morally reprehensible but methodologically flawed. He relied heavily on the testimonies of criminals, including rapists and child molesters, yet presented their behavior as "normal" in his reports.^22 Kinsey's goal, it becomes clear, was to dismantle the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic that had shaped Western society for centuries and replace it with a vision of sexual liberation where no act was too perverse.
Kinsey's influence on modern sex education cannot be overstated. His work laid the intellectual foundation for the sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s, which sought to break the connection between sex, morality, and reproduction. Kinsey's work gave the appearance of scientific legitimacy to behaviors that were once universally condemned—homosexuality, pedophilia, and extramarital sex. He introduced the idea that human sexuality exists on a fluid continuum, represented by his "Kinsey scale," which ranged from exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual. This concept continues to influence sex education curricula today, as schools promote the notion that sexual orientation is not fixed and encourage children to explore their sexuality.
Perhaps the most horrifying aspect of Kinsey's legacy is that his work on child sexuality continues to inform sex education in public schools. The fact that modern sex education curricula are based, in part, on the research of a man who defended pedophiles and advocated for the sexual abuse of children is nothing short of abhorrent. Kinsey's depraved views on sex, sexuality, and childhood development have shaped the way generations of children have been taught about their bodies and their relationships, and the damage caused by his influence is immeasurable.
Kinsey's influence extended far beyond academia. His work inspired figures like Hugh Hefner, founder of Playboy magazine, who described himself as "Kinsey's pamphleteer." ^23 Hefner credited Kinsey with providing the scientific justification for the sexual revolution, famously promoting the mantra "fornicate early, fornicate often, fornicate in every possible way." ^24 Kinsey's research became the foundation for the pornography industry, sexual promiscuity, and the breakdown of traditional family structures in America.
Kinsey's association with criminals like Rex King and his defense of pedophilia expose his work for what it truly was: an attempt to rationalize and justify sexual immorality in its most perverse forms. The fact that this man's research laid the foundation for the sexual education of millions of children is a testament to the moral decay of the public education system. By normalizing deviant sexual behavior, Kinsey's work opened the floodgates to the hypersexualization of children that is so pervasive in today's schools.
THE ROLE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD
If Alfred Kinsey laid the intellectual foundation for the hypersexualization of America, then Planned Parenthood became its most effective implementer. Founded by Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood has long been at the forefront of the sexual liberation movement in the United States, and sex education has been a key part of its strategy. The organization's sex education programs have been implemented in public schools across the country, with a curriculum designed to encourage sexual experimentation and promote abortion as a solution to the consequences of promiscuity.
Planned Parenthood's involvement in sex education goes far beyond simply teaching children the biological facts of reproduction. It is about shaping their attitudes toward sex. Their materials, including books, pamphlets, and lesson plans, normalize sexual activity for minors, presenting contraception and abortion as simple, consequence-free choices. One of the most controversial aspects of Planned Parenthood's curriculum is its promotion of gender ideology and sexual identity exploration. This encourages children to question their biological sex and explore non-heteronormative sexual identities.
The curriculum also frequently includes explicit material. For example, Planned Parenthood's Our Whole Lives program, used in many schools, introduces young children to topics like masturbation and contraception at an age when most parents would expect their children to be learning basic academic skills.^25 As the grade levels progress, the content becomes even more explicit, discussing sexual acts in graphic detail and promoting the use of condoms, birth control, and abortion.^26
What's even more concerning is that Planned Parenthood's involvement in sex education isn't purely altruistic. The organization stands to benefit financially from increased sexual activity among minors. By normalizing and encouraging promiscuity, Planned Parenthood ensures that more young people will face unintended pregnancies, which will lead them to seek out the organization's abortion services.^27 It's no coincidence that the same organization profiting from abortion is responsible for teaching children that sexual activity is something to explore at an early age. This creates a vicious cycle where young people are essentially groomed into sexual behavior, leading to pregnancies that Planned Parenthood is only too willing to terminate.^28
The idea that Planned Parenthood, an organization responsible for millions of abortions, is shaping sex education in public schools is nothing short of horrifying. It presents a blatant conflict of interest. An institution that profits from the consequences of promiscuity should not be in charge of teaching children about sex. Yet, this is the reality in the United States today. Planned Parenthood's influence over public education continues to grow, poisoning the minds of future generations.^29
THE CURRENT STATE OF SEXUALIZED CURRICULUM
EXAMPLES OF DEPRAVITY
As this new school year kicks off across Massachusetts, students are walking back into classrooms where they'll be bombarded with ideologies and teachings that blatantly contradict biblical values. Massachusetts schools are leading the charge in pushing a sexualized curriculum through programs like Comprehensive Sexuality Education, or CSE. And let's be clear—this isn't just education but indoctrination. Planned Parenthood's "Get Real" curriculum, which is being fed to children as young as elementary school, introduces them to sexual content that no child should ever be exposed to.
One outrageous example is the recommendation to use non-microwaveable Saran Wrap as a prophylactic for oral sex.^30 That's right—this is what Massachusetts sex ed programs are teaching. And while that sinks in, let's consider the question: is it appropriate to teach 12-year-olds about anal sex? According to Planned Parenthood and the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, it is.^31 Their "Get Real" curriculum, which is compliant with state health frameworks, encourages middle and high school students to engage in behaviors that are not just risky—but are a one-way ticket to both physical and spiritual destruction.
The graphic, explicit content in these programs goes beyond education—it's a blatant attempt to transform society's sexual and gender norms. This isn't traditional sex ed. Comprehensive Sexuality Education actively encourages young children to explore high-risk sexual behaviors. And who benefits? Planned Parenthood does. By grooming children to engage in promiscuity, they're creating future clients—teens who will need abortions, STI treatments, and even transgender hormone therapies. Former Planned Parenthood educator Monica Cline even admitted it, calling these programs "the perfect business plan for lifelong customers." ^32
MASSACHUSETTS: THE EPICENTER OF WICKEDNESS
Let's face it: Massachusetts has become the epicenter of this sexualized agenda, where even kindergarteners are being subjected to explicit material. The state's Department of Elementary and Secondary Education approved frameworks that teach Pre-K children to explore their own bodies, third graders to question their gender, and older kids to believe that any sexual act is fine—as long as it's consensual.^33 And this indoctrination isn't limited to sex ed—it's infiltrating subjects like social studies, history, and even math under the guise of "anti-bullying" campaigns, social justice programs, and pride-themed clubs aimed at elementary school students!
One of the most egregious examples is the state's endorsement of the book It's Perfectly Normal, recommended for kids as young as 10 years old. This book—used in the "Get Real" curriculum—includes 67 nude illustrations, showing everything from sex and masturbation to a man putting on a condom.^34 It's nothing short of disgusting. These images and teachings are poisoning young minds, pulling them away from God's design for sexual purity and instead promoting a worldview that glorifies moral relativism and sexual perversion.
And just when you thought it couldn't get worse, the Massachusetts legislature is pushing the "Healthy Youth Act." If passed, this radical curriculum would be mandatory in all public schools. That means every district teaching sex education would have to use CSE programs like "Get Real." And while parents technically still have the right to opt their kids out, we all know how this works—children are going to be exposed to this filth through their peers, whether or not they attend these classes.
The consequences are devastating, and parents across the state are desperately trying to push back. In some cases, parents aren't even given access to the entire curriculum.^35 Instead, they're handed vague outlines that conveniently omit the explicit nature of what's being taught. Under the "Get Real" program, students are shown how to perform sexual acts and told that sexual pleasure is a basic right—completely severing any connection between sex, marriage, or biblical morality.
THE FIGHT AGAINST COMPREHENSIVE SEX EDUCATION
But there's hope. The resistance to this radical indoctrination is growing. Groups like Massachusetts Family Institute and Massachusetts Informed Parents are fighting back, and in some communities, parents have successfully convinced their local school boards to reject these CSE programs. Organizations like Stop CSE are spotlighting this madness, producing films like The War on Children to expose what's happening. Their research shows that all of the DESE-approved sex ed curricula contain nearly all 15 harmful elements identified in their analysis—including the promotion of anal and oral sex, masturbation, and transgender ideology.^36
Let's be absolutely clear—Comprehensive Sexuality Education isn't about health; it's about grooming. It's a tool for organizations like Planned Parenthood to create lifelong customers by luring children into a sexually permissive lifestyle, leading them straight into the arms of abortion clinics and STI treatments. And now, with the "Healthy Youth Act" on the horizon, the battle is heating up. But parents and concerned citizens still have time to stand up, speak out, and put a stop to this perversion before it spreads any further.
WHY VOTING DEMOCRAT IS A SIN
The Democratic Party is inseparable from the moral corruption that has overtaken this nation, especially when it comes to sexual education and the destruction of children's innocence. From their historic embrace of figures like Margaret Sanger to their ongoing defense of Planned Parenthood, the Democrats have been at the forefront of pushing forward a sexual revolution that glorifies promiscuity, perversion, and the exploitation of children. They are not passive participants in this cultural decay—they are its architects.
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, wasn't merely a promoter of contraception—she was a eugenicist, a racist, and a sexual libertine who saw children as obstacles to be eliminated rather than gifts to be cherished. The Bible is clear that children are a blessing from the Lord. Psalm 127:3 tells us, "Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward." Yet Sanger and her organization view children as problems, not blessings. Planned Parenthood, which has taken her wicked ideas and expanded them into a multi-billion-dollar industry, targets the most vulnerable—our children and unborn babies. The Democrats have not only endorsed but championed this organization, defending its practices of abortion and sexualization, all while allowing it to influence public education.
Alfred Kinsey, another key figure in the Democrat-supported sexual revolution, used fraudulent research to normalize deviant sexual behaviors and paved the way for today's Comprehensive Sexuality Education. His so-called "studies" on child sexuality—research that involved the abuse of minors—form the very foundation upon which modern sex ed programs are built. Kinsey's work has led to curricula that teach children about anal sex, masturbation, and transgender ideologies. Scripture tells us in Ephesians 5:11, "Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them." Kinsey's work is nothing but darkness, yet Democrats continue to defend and promote his influence, pushing laws like the "Healthy Youth Act," which mandates this perversion in schools.
The Democratic Party, at its core, is the party of Planned Parenthood and other organizations that exist to hypersexualize children. They have created the conditions where children become "lifelong customers" of the abortion and STI treatment industries. This is the same party that pushes the idea that children should be treated as sexual objects—leading them into behaviors that result in disease, emotional scars, and abortion. When you vote for the Democrats, you are not merely casting a vote for higher taxes or social programs—you are aligning yourself with those who promote a worldview that turns innocent children into tools of sexual deviants and predators.
Jesus Himself warned us about those who would harm children, saying in Matthew 18:6, "But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." By supporting the Democratic Party and its policies, we are endorsing a party that is actively leading children astray and dragging them into sin.
MORAL CLARITY
Voting for the Democratic Party means supporting policies that seek to corrupt the minds and bodies of children. Proverbs 22:6 says, "Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old, he will not depart from it." The responsibility of raising children in righteousness belongs to parents and the church, but the Democrats work to undermine that godly instruction at every turn. Their policies encourage the corruption of children's hearts and minds, teaching them that sin is not only acceptable but to be celebrated.
Romans 1:32 speaks directly to this, saying, "Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them." The Democratic Party has not only embraced these sinful practices—they give full approval to them, encouraging others to do the same.
CALL TO REPENTANCE
Now is the time for repentance. We cannot align ourselves with a political party that directly opposes God's Word. Acts 3:19 says, "Repent therefore, and turn back, that your sins may be blotted out." It's time to reject the Democratic Party's agenda and turn back to the truth of the Gospel. Repent from any allegiance to this wicked organization and instead align yourself with Christ, who calls us to protect the most vulnerable—our children.
Isaiah 5:20 says, "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness." This is precisely what the Democratic Party does—calling evil good and perverting God's truth. Christians are called to stand against this deception and fight for righteousness.
Let's protect our children from the corruption of this world, from the false teachings that the Democratic Party embraces and promotes. Stand up for biblical truth and fight for a world where children are raised in the fear and admonition of the Lord, not in the twisted ideologies of Kinsey, Sanger, and their modern-day disciples.
CONCLUSION
Voting for the Democratic Party is not just a political decision—it's a moral and spiritual choice with profound, eternal consequences. When we cast our vote, we're not simply deciding on tax policies or healthcare—we're aligning ourselves with a worldview. The Democratic Party has made its worldview clear. They are the architects of moral decay, promoting sexual perversion and leading children astray, especially through their control over public education. Jesus' words in Matthew 18:6 should ring loud and clear: "Whoever causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for him to have a millstone hung around his neck and be drowned in the depth of the sea."
As Christians, we cannot stand by while the innocent are led down a path of destruction. This is a call to action. We must reject the lies, the false teachings, and the agenda that the Democratic Party continues to push. Proverbs 22:6 reminds us to "train up a child in the way he should go." That is our sacred responsibility—not the government's. And if we don't stand up for biblical truth, who will?
The time for compromise is over. The future of our children, our churches, and our nation depends on our willingness to speak the truth boldly. Reject the lies, vote according to God's Word, and protect the most vulnerable in our society. This isn't just about politics but about taking a stand for righteousness. Spread the truth, share this message, and reclaim this nation for Christ.
FOOTNOTES:
Aristotle, Politics, Book 8, Chapter 1, 1337a.
Edmund S. Morgan, The Puritan Family: Religion and Domestic Relations in Seventeenth-Century New England(New York: Harper & Row, 1944), 95-96.
Lawrence A. Cremin, The Republic and the School: Horace Mann on the Education of Free Men (New York: Teachers College Press, 1957), 14-15.
"Planned Parenthood at the Forefront of Sex Education in U.S. Schools," Family Research Council, June 2019, accessed August 30, 2023.
Voddie Baucham, Fault Lines: The Social Justice Movement and Evangelicalism's Looming Catastrophe(Washington, D.C.: Salem Books, 2021), 79-81.
"California School District Policy on Gender Identity," California Department of Education, 2021.
"Faith in Crisis: Why Christian Youth are Abandoning the Church," Barna Group, 2019.
Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization (New York: Brentano's, 1922), 189.
Angela Franks, Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2005), 107.
Margaret Sanger, Letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, December 10, 1939, Smith College Collections, Sophia Smith Archives, Margaret Sanger Papers.
Edwin Black, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race (New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 2003), 329.
Jean H. Baker, Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion (New York: Hill and Wang, 2011), 222.
Hillary Clinton, Remarks at Planned Parenthood Federation of America Awards Gala, March 27, 2009.
"Planned Parenthood at the Forefront of Sex Education in U.S. Schools," Family Research Council, June 2019, accessed August 30, 2023.
Judith Reisman, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences (Institute for Media Education, 1998), 203-204.
Ibid., 206.
Ibid., 215-216.
Alfred Kinsey, Testimony Before California General Assembly's Subcommittee on Sex Crimes, 1949.
James H. Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), 570.
Ibid., 575.
Miriam Grossman, You're Teaching My Child What? (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, 2009), 45.
Reisman, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, 210-211.
Hugh Hefner, "The Playboy Philosophy," Playboy Magazine, January 1962.
Ibid.
"Our Whole Lives: Lifespan Sexuality Education," Planned Parenthood, accessed August 30, 2023.
"Planned Parenthood's Graphic Sex Education," Family Research Council, June 2019, accessed August 30, 2023.
Abby Johnson, Unplanned: The Dramatic True Story of a Former Planned Parenthood Leader's Eye-Opening Journey Across the Life Line (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2011), 112-114.
"Planned Parenthood: A Culture of Death," Live Action, June 2021, accessed August 30, 2023.
"Planned Parenthood's Role in Public School Sex Education," American Life League, 2021.
"Get Real: Comprehensive Sex Education That Works," Planned Parenthood, accessed August 30, 2023.
Ibid.
Monica Cline, "Planned Parenthood's Plan to Turn Kids into Lifelong Customers," American Thinker, April 2019.
"Massachusetts Comprehensive Health Curriculum Frameworks," Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, accessed August 30, 2023.
Robie H. Harris, It's Perfectly Normal: Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex, and Sexual Health (Candlewick Press, 2014).
"The Fight Against Radical Sex Ed in Massachusetts," Massachusetts Family Institute, accessed August 30, 2023.
"Stop CSE: The War on Children," Stop CSE, accessed August 30, 2023.
